1. Great series, Becky. Of course food and sex and entertainment were given for our enjoyment and, yes, I agree that the minute we are greedy or selfish in any area, we sin. That’s a huge problem for us–taking more than is good for us and more than is good for our service to others and more than is good for our relationship with God.

    Thanks for the reminders.

  2. Kaci says:

    Just to throw it out there, and forgive me if I’m revisiting a past conversation: I think for both those who perform in the arts (musicians, writers, artists, etc) and their audience, there’s another question. For me, the writer, is it sin for me to even write it; and, for me, the reader, is it sin for me to read it? There’s an objective and subjective part to both those questions, but that seems to be where the arts world boils down to.

    For example, I have a friend who, as a rule, does not watch R-rated movies. Somewhere along the way, she simply made a vow she wouldn’t. Then comes along The Passion of the Christ, which is evidently the only R-rated movie Christians are required to watch. *snort* Anyway, she received a hefty amount of flack for NOT watching The Passion: both by people who thought she was being legalistic in not watching an R movie and by those who thought the movie, as I said, something every good Christian should watch.

    I dunno. I know your topic is on entertainment in general, so I’ve very well gotten off-topic here. But since I don’t consider things that revel in sin to be entertaining, I suppose it is what it is. Try to show me a movie that gorges itself in sin, and I’ll show you a movie I can barely tolerate, at the very least. Course, I don’t think I’d put Lion King in the same category as Golden Compass, either, but that’s me.

    And I admittedly never understood the “if you’ll scream and cheer at a ball game, why not at church?” type questions. I don’t scream, jump around, or cheer, period. I am pretty likely to dance in place, play invisible instruments, bow, raise my hands, or remove my shoes in church. (That’s just a side comment directed at no one.)

    And I’m rambling, so I’ll stop talking now. 0=)

  3. Thanks for the feedback, Sally. You said

    That’s a huge problem for us–taking more than is good for us and more than is good for our service to others and more than is good for our relationship with God.

    I think that’s my main concern. In our society which I believe is on a downward spiral toward hedonism, will we know or recognize when we are taking more than is good for us or for our relationships, especially with God?

    I remain convinced that this must be a heart issue, not something one person can decide for others, but maybe we need to at least talk about the principles and call each other to give an account of our time. (That’s frightening!) I guess even more important is to ask God to search us and show us what He would have us do in this area (novel idea – 😉 ).

    Becky

  4. Kaci, I don’t think you got off topic. Your point is excellent — writers and readers both have to apply principles to our involvement in entertainment. If you’d asked me, I think I would have said I should not have a different standard for my reading than from my writing. But I do. I’m more particular about what I write than what I read/view. I’ll have to think about that one for a while.

    And The Lion King as a cultural awareness movie — it is a good illustration of a feel-good movie, one we can enjoy on the entertainment level, that is filled with ideas contradicting Scripture. It’s filled with eastern mysticism references, just as The Wizard of Oz is filled with humanism.

    Becky

What do you think?